Legal Opinion

Pacific Coin Lock Co. v. Coin Controlling Lock Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 4, 1929No. 5658PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.

On February 23, 1915, appellee entered into a continuing contract with one Garrison conferring upon him the right to use and rent in California and Texas coin controlled locks which it manufactured and upon which it held letters patent. One of Garrison’s obligations was an annual rental charge at the rate of $10 per lock, one half to be paid on the 1st day of January and the other half on the 1st day of July of each year, beginning with January 1, 1915. On the day it was executed, the contract was, with appellee’s consent, assigned by Garrison to the appellant, who…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hanson v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
  2. Rathborne, Hair & Ridgeway Co. v. WheelihanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pure Oil Pipe Line Co. v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  2. Farmers Elevator Service Co. v. HoganDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1948
  3. Truth Seeker Co. v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  4. Truth Seeker Co. v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API