Legal Opinion

(HC) Glover v. CDCR At CHCF

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 25, 2019No. 2:18-cv-02816Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID GLOVER, No. 2:18-cv-02816-DB P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 CDCR AT CHCF, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. 20 Examination of the affidavit reveals petitioner is unable to afford the costs of this action. 21 Accordingly, leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 22…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Muhammad v. CloseSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API