Legal Opinion
Toyos v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided April 3, 1944No. Motion No. 1002PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreenberg, J.
Claimant moves herein for leave to file a claim pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 10 of the Court of Claims Act. A reasonable excuse for the failure to file the claim or notice of intention within the statutory period has been offered but the proposed claim is under attack and question is raised as to the sufficiency thereof.
The proposed claim and affidavit in support of this application allege that the sum of $1,200 was paid by the claimant as a fee for a restaurant liquor license issued for the period from March 1, 1942, to February 28, 1943; that on October 5, 1942, the license was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Yates v. MulrooneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Siegel v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Chergotis v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Joyce v. BruckmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Apropo v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ritter v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1953
- Long Island Railroad v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1945
- Speare v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1964
- New York Central Railroad v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1944
- Bienstock v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1955