Legal Opinion

State v. Cheadle, 2007-P-0083 (5-16-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 16, 2008No. 2007-P-0083Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Adam Cheadle, appeals the judgment of the Portage County Municipal Court, Kent Division, denying his motion to suppress evidence. We affirm the judgment of the lower court.

{¶ 2} On March 22, 2007, Cheadle was charged with one count of Voyeurism, a misdemeanor of the first degree, in violation of R.C. 2907.08. Cheadle, a student at Kent State University, shared a dormitory suite with three other male students, which consisted of two individual living rooms with a shared bathroom and separate bedrooms. The charges arose from an incident occurring on March 19,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API