Legal Opinion
Jazz Photo Corp. v. International Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 21, 2001No. Nos. 99-1431, 99-1504, 99-1595, 99-1596, 99-1601PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
In an action brought under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1337, Fuji Photo Film Co. charged twenty-seven respondents, including the appellants Jazz Photo Corporation, Dynatec International, Inc., and Opticolor, Inc., with infringement of fifteen patents owned by Fuji. The charge was based on the respondents’ importation of used “single-use” cameras called “lens-fitted film packages” (LFFP’s), which had been refurbished1 for reuse in various overseas facilities. Section 337 makes unlawful “[t]he importation into the United States ...…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark Int'l, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Fuji Photo Film Co. Ltd. v. Jazz Photo Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- Fujifilm Corp. v. BenunCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Fuji Photo Film Co. Ltd. v. Jazz Photo Corp. Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- Jazz Photo Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.