Legal Opinion

Fulmore v. Howell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 7, 2013No. COA12-1384PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals summary judgment order granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment based upon the doctrine of sudden emergency. For the following reasons, we affirm.

I. Background

Plaintiff, the administrator of the estate of Priscilla Maultsby, filed a complaint alleging defendants were liable for Ms. Maultsby’s death. Plaintiff alleged that defendant Gregory “Howell was an agent or employee” of defendant PFS Distribution Company, Inc., (“PFS”) when he was driving a tractor trailer truck “owned, rented or leased” by defendant PFS which collided with Ms. Maultsby’s vehicle.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mabrey v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Lord v. BeermanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. Forgy v. SchwartzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. State v. LaneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Smith v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Doe v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2019
  2. KITCHEL v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2023
  3. THE CITY OF HIGH POINT, NORTH CAROLINA v. SUEZ TREATMENT SOLUTIONS INC.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API