Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Borgman (In Re Borgman)

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 23, 2012No. 11-1369, 11-1371PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

This appeal presents the question of whether the amount of a federal tax refund equivalent to the “nonrefundable” portion of the child tax credit of 26 U.S.C. § 24(a) is exempt from a bankruptcy debt- or’s estate under Colorado Revised Statutes § 13-54-102(l)(o). That statute exempts from a bankruptcy estate “[t]he full amount of any federal or state income tax refund attributed to an earned income tax credit or a child tax credit.” Id. The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel held that the disputed refunds were exempt. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d)(1), we REVERSE.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Kokoszka v. BelfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Lewis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Jones v. Liberty Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. People v. ZapotockySupreme Court of Colorado · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  2. In re SharpUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2013
  3. Lunt v. Peoples Bank (In re Lunt)District Court, D. Kansas · 2013
  4. Nelson v. Long (In Re Long)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  5. Brock v. Glasser (In Re Brock)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API