Legal Opinion
Gee v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided June 11, 1932No. A-8317PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.
Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Okfuskee county of the crime of robbery with firearms, and his punishment fixed by the jury at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a period of five years.
It is first contended that the defendant is entitled to a new trial on account of misconduct of the county attorney in the cross-examination of defendant and his alibi witnesses.
Defendant had testified that he had never carried a gun in his life. On cross-examination, the county attorney asked him if he was ever arrested for carrying a gun. He…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Fowler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- Killough v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Musgraves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- Morgan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Crowell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Valenti v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1964
- Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1944
- Haskette v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1932
- Fowler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945