Armstrong v. Burdette Tomlin Memorial Hospital
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL
BROTMAN, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion for a New Trial pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 59. For the reasons expressed below, Plaintiffs motion will be denied.
I. BACKGROUND
The background and procedural history of this case have been previously documented in prior Opinions and Orders of this Court. 1 On July 17, 2000, Plaintiff Arnie Armstrong (“Plaintiff’) brought this suit against his employer, Burdette Tomlin Memorial Hospital (“Burdette”), and individual Defendants Richard Kraus (“Kraus”), Edward Moylett (“Moylett”), and…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Katherine L. Taylor v. Phoenixville School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Miller v. Bill Harbert International Construction, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- American Civil Liberties Union v. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013