Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Burdette Tomlin Memorial Hospital

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided August 13, 2003No. Civil Action 00-3441PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL

BROTMAN, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion for a New Trial pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 59. For the reasons expressed below, Plaintiffs motion will be denied.

I. BACKGROUND

The background and procedural history of this case have been previously documented in prior Opinions and Orders of this Court. 1 On July 17, 2000, Plaintiff Arnie Armstrong (“Plaintiff’) brought this suit against his employer, Burdette Tomlin Memorial Hospital (“Burdette”), and individual Defendants Richard Kraus (“Kraus”), Edward Moylett (“Moylett”), and…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. Katherine L. Taylor v. Phoenixville School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  4. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Miller v. Bill Harbert International Construction, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  2. American Civil Liberties Union v. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API