Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v. Katz
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.
Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company (PNB) appeals from a judgment of the circuit court upholding the Public Utility Commission’s (PUC) orders 89-1274 and 90-1457. In order 89-1274, PUC concluded that it has jurisdiction over Address Telephone Directories (ATDs) and Business and Customer Lists (BCLs). 1 In order 90-1457 PUC denied PNB’s petition to abandon its production of ATDs and BCLs. PNB makes several assignments of error, but essentially argues that PUC’s assertion of jurisdiction over ATDs and BCLs is in error, because those services are not “telecommunications services” as defined…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v. KatzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
3Cited by6 opinions
- US West Communications, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Citizens' Utility Board v. Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- US West Communications, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Low-Income Consumers Union v. Oregon Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- US West v. Utilities and Transp. Com'nWashington Supreme Court · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.