State v. Menke
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
ORME, Judge:
Defendant appeals his conviction for retail theft, a class A misdemeanor, in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 76-6-602(1) (1989). The conviction was based on defendant’s conditional guilty plea, entered after he unsuccessfully sought to suppress critical evidence. Defendant argues on appeal that the police officers who arrested him did not have an articulable suspicion to stop him or probable cause to search and seize property in his possession. We affirm.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
We begin by recognizing that “[b]ecause of the trial court’s advantageous position in determining the factual…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. WorwoodUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. TalbotCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
- Kaysville City v. MulcahyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
- State v. GrovierCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
- State v. RoweCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.