Legal Opinion
State Board of Dispensing Opticians v. Carp
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided October 29, 1958No. 6626PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WINDES, Justice.
Ellis Carp and others filed with the State Board of Dispensing Opticians applications for licenses to practice as dispensing opticians. Licenses were not issued for the reasons hereinafter related. Applicants filed an action in the superior court seeking writ of mandamus to compel the board to issue the licenses. The lower court directed the issuance of a peremptory writ as requested. The board appeals, claiming that the court could not legally require issuance of writ of mandamus.
In Chapter 15.1, Title 32, A.R.S., provision is made for the creation of a board of dispensing…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. PhelpsArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Arizona State Highway Commission v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- State Ex Rel. Walls v. State Board of Land Com'rsWyoming Supreme Court · 1927
- Dunshee v. ManningArizona Supreme Court · 1942
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Ariz. St. Bd. of P. & P. v. Superior Court of Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Shelby School v. Arizona State Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- City of Phoenix Ex Rel. Backstein v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967