Great American Ins. Co. v. Ray
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtNickels, J.
Judgment for the insured was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 4 S.W.(2d) 88. For a general statement of the case we make reference to the opinion of that court. Writ of error was allowed upon assignments presenting matters to be noticed.
1. Sheppard became “manager” or “agent,” at Kerens, of the insurer in March, 1920, and continued as such until some time after issuance of the policy in question. The company, through its “special agent or State agent,” “checked him in,” and “then gave him instructions with reference to what property they did not write.” Those instructions were: “This…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Scott v. TownsendTexas Supreme Court · 1914
- Scott v. TownsendTexas Supreme Court · 1914
- Delaware Underwriters & Westchester Fire Insurance v. BrockTexas Supreme Court · 1919
- East Texas Fire Insurance v. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Craycroft v. CrawfordTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pennsylvania Fire Ins. Co. v. Waggoner EstateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Texas City Terminal Railway Co. v. American Equitable Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1955
- Farrington v. Commercial Standard Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- People's Nat. Fire Ins. Co. v. Texarkana Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. Rhode Island Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.