Legal Opinion
D.C. Transportation Services, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided May 16, 1994No. 5:94 CV 305PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DOWD, District Judge.
Before the Court are two motions to dismiss, one filed by defendants The Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Northern Ohio, The Akron Coca-Cola Bottling Company, Johnston Great Lakes Canning, Inc., Great Lakes Canning, Inc. and Soft Drink Carriers, Inc. (collectively, “CCB”)1 (Docket No. 11), and the other filed by the remaining defendant, ABARTA Transportation Services, Inc. (“ABARTA”) (Docket No. 12). Both CCB and ABARTA seek dismissal of Count II for failure to state a claim and of Counts I and III for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.2
The Court is of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marvin Hayes Lines, Inc. v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Korea Shipping Corp. v. New York Shipping Ass'n-International Longshoremen's Ass'n Pension Trust FundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Dorn's Transportation, Inc., and Oneida Motor Freight, Inc. v. Teamsters Pension Trust Fund of Philadelphia and VicinityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Bennett v. MacHined Metals Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Triple E Produce Corp. v. Mastronardi Produce, Ltd.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995