Legal Opinion
Chim v. State
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided January 17, 2008No. 2006-KA-01839-SCTPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
972 So.2d 601 (2008)
Gilberto Hilario CHIM
v.
STATE of Mississippi.
No. 2006-KA-01839-SCT.
Supreme Court of Mississippi.
January 17, 2008.
Edmund J. Phillips, Jr., attorney for appellant.
Office of the Attorney General by W. Glenn Watts, attorney for appellee.
EN BANC.
GRAVES, Justice, for the Court.
¶ 1. Chim appeals his conviction of statutory rape and sexual battery, contending that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress his confession in violation of his Fifth and Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Chim maintains that he did not knowingly and intelligently waive his Miranda rights,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Evans v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
- Holland v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
- Agee v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hearn v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
- Ruffin v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
- Scott v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
- Downey v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2014
- Armstead v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.