Legal Opinion
Ray v. Mangum
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided December 29, 1989No. CV-89-0273-PRPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Justice.
I. JURISDICTION
Clora Jacqueline Ray (“Ray”) (formerly Clora Jacqueline Mangum), seeks review of a court of appeals’ memorandum decision that denied her request for child support arrearages in the amount of $21,950.00. We have jurisdiction under Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3) and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.
II. ISSUES
A. Was there clear and compelling evidence to support a finding that Ray had waived her claim to past due child support?
B. Did the fact that the parties signed an agreement to increase child support estop Ray from claiming child support arrearages?
III. FACTS
On 31 May 1977,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- American Continental Life Insurance v. Ranier Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1980
- Hatch v. HatchArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Heltzel v. Mecham PontiacArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Lamb v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Browne v. StanleySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
- Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Arizona State Department of RevenueArizona Tax Court · 1991
- Marinello v. GloverCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Oliveira v. OliveiraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
- Ryan v. eXp Realty LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.