Legal Opinion

Reeder v. Bally's Total Fitness Corp.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided May 9, 1997No. Civil Action 2:96cv619Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MORGAN, District Judge.

On April 30, 1997, this Court conducted a bench trial in the above-styled action on plaintiffs claims for breach of express and implied warranties in a bailment or lease agreement, and for negligence. See Va.Code Ann. §§ 8.2A-210, 8.2A-212, 8.2A-213. AH claims arose from an injury plaintiff, Olar Reeder, allegedly received while using a stomach curl machine at Bally’s Total Fitness Corporation’s (“Bally’s”) Chesapeake, Virginia facility. Ruling from the bench, the Court GRANTED the defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law at the close of plaintiffs ease.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Paul Carter v. William L. Ball, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  3. Resolution Trust Corp. v. EugenioDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API