Bruno v. People

Opinion by

Denison, J.

Dependant was convicted on one count of having intoxicating liquor in his possession, and on another count of importing intoxicating liquor into the State.

His defense was that he did not know that the liquor found in his home was there, that it was in his mother’s possession, and not his, and that he did not know that the “Salad Oil” which he received at the railroad station was whiskey, and that not he but his brother ordered it.

He argues the following points:

1. That the court permitted the District Attorney to endorse the name of witness Mangold after the jury was…