Legal Opinion
(HC) Franklin v. Hill
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 3, 2021No. 2:21-cv-00275Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DERRICK JAMES FRANKLIN, No. 2:21-cv-00275 JAM GGH P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 RICK HILL, Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 19 U.S.C. § 1915. 20 Examination of the in forma pauperis affidavit reveals that petitioner is unable to afford 21 the costs of suit. Accordingly, the request for leave to proceed in forma…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Raymond Edward Middleton v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Superintendent, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- John K. Lincoln v. Franklin Y.K. SunnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.