Legal Opinion

State of Minnesota v. Julian Sanchez-Sanchez

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 18, 2016No. A14-584PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUDSON, Justice.

This case presents the issue of whether the Minnesota Rules of Evidence apply in a court trial, which was held in accordance with Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), to determine whether any aggravating sentencing factors exist. Following a straight guilty plea, appellant Julian Sanchez-Sanchez waived his right to have a jury determine whether aggravating factors existed to justify an upward durational departure in his sentence. Instead, Sanchez-Sanchez submitted the Blakely question to the district court. Without objection, the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. State v. RameySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. State v. MahkukSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  5. State v. MiltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WaitersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
  2. State v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  3. State of Minnesota v. Berry Alan WillisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  4. State of Minnesota v. Adam Taylor FravelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2026
  5. State of Minnesota v. Evan James FasthorseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API