State of Minnesota v. Julian Sanchez-Sanchez
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUDSON, Justice.
This case presents the issue of whether the Minnesota Rules of Evidence apply in a court trial, which was held in accordance with Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), to determine whether any aggravating sentencing factors exist. Following a straight guilty plea, appellant Julian Sanchez-Sanchez waived his right to have a jury determine whether aggravating factors existed to justify an upward durational departure in his sentence. Instead, Sanchez-Sanchez submitted the Blakely question to the district court. Without objection, the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. RameySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. MahkukSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. MiltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. WaitersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- State of Minnesota v. Berry Alan WillisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Adam Taylor FravelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Evan James FasthorseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.