Legal Opinion
Huddleston v. Western National Bank
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 13, 1979No. 8921PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
DODSON, Justice.
We withdraw our December 29, 1978, opinion and, in lieu thereof, substitute this opinion.
Jack Huddleston appeals from an order of the trial court dismissing his stockholder’s derivative suit brought on behalf of Western National Bank of Amarillo and against Roy Whittenburg, the bank’s president and principal stockholder. The court sustained a plea in abatement filed by Whittenburg and the bank (hereinafter appellees), which contained several grounds, one being that Huddleston did not adequately represent the class of bank stockholders. The dismissal…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Burke v. SatterfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- Kirk v. HeadTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Texas Osage Co-Op. Royalty Pool v. KemperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
- Canion v. Texas Cycle Supply, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Hernandez v. Light Pub. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Vinson v. Texas Commerce Bank-Houston, National Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
- Teixeira v. Hall, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
- RSR Corp. v. Hayes, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
- In the Interest of Simpson, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1996
- Cedar Crest Funeral Home, Inc. v. Lashley, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.