Legal Opinion

Edison Electric Light & Power Co. of St. Paul v. Blomquist

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 20, 1911PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the Edison Electric Eight & Power Company of St. Paul and-another against W. J. Blomquist and others, On motion for a temporary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

WILLARD, District Judge.

On March 31, 1910, the common council, of the city of St. Paul passed an ordinance requiring electric light and-power .companies, telephone, telegraph, and street railway companies at their own expense to remove or displace their wires lawfully in the strefet when a licensed house mover, who had procured a permit from the city authorities to move a house through the streets, requested them to do so. This bill was filed to restrain Blomquist, a house mover, from interfering with the wires of the complainants in -the streets of St. Paul, and to restrain the city…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. New Orleans Gas Light Co. v. Drainage Commission of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Railroad Co. v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Wilson v. Eureka CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1899

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Yellowstone Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. OstermillerMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Minneapolis General Electric Co. v. City of MinneapolisU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1911
  3. Minneapolis St. Ry. Co. v. City of MinneapolisU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1911
  4. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. SproulSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  5. City of Yale v. DavenportSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API