Legal Opinion

City of Yale v. Davenport

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 4, 1936No. 26702PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The plaintiff in error was defendant in the trial court, .and the defendants in error were plaintiffs. They will be referred to as they appeared therein. The plaintiffs are in the business of moving houses. On the 5th day of October, 1985, they filed an application in the district court for a writ of mandamus to require the proper authorities to Issue a permit to move certain dwelling houses in the city of Yale, Okla. Omitting the formal parts, it is as follows:

“That the plaintiffs are engaged in the business and occupation of moving buildings; that one Sam Patton has contracted with said…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. City of Sapulpa v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Wilson v. Eureka CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Eureka City v. WilsonUtah Supreme Court · 1897
  5. United States v. CohenDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1920

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sisler v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API