Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Geauga Lake Improvement Ass'n v. Lozier

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1932No. 23268 and 23269PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnLEN, J.

The proposed village lies in the extreme southwest corner of Bainbridge township in Geauga county, and the extreme northwest corner of Aurora township in Portage county, and the large area of platted territory resided in by members of the plaintiff association and excluded from the proposed village also lies in the extreme northwest corner of Aurora township in Portage county, immediately adjacent to the platted territory described in the petition for incorporation. The proposed village includes the body of water known as Geauga Lake, and also includes the amusement park situated upon that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Jennett v. OwensTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. McConaughy v. Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  3. Ragland v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  4. Stanton v. State Tax CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Hulbert v. MasonOhio Supreme Court · 1876

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Board of Trustees v. for Incorporation of Holiday CityOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Smith v. Goodwill Industries of the Miami Valley, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. In re Petition for Incorporation of the Village of Holiday CityOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Baumhardt v. MitchellOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. Eagle v. SchaeferOhio Supreme Court · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API