Legal Opinion

United States v. William J. MacQueen Leonard A. Siniscalchi, Diamond J. Armello, Charles P. Zimmerman

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 2, 1979No. 255, 259, 334 and 335, Dockets 78-1271, 1272, 1273, 1294PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRATT, District Judge:

All defendants appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Sifton, J.) entered on June 2, 1978, convicting them, after a jury trial following a mistrial, of conspiracy to manufacture firearm silencers in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 and 26 U.S.C. § 5861. Defendant MacQueen appeals, too, from a judgment entered by the same court on the same day, convicting him of 22 substantive violations of the National Firearms Act. 26 U.S.C. § 5801 et seq.

MacQueen argues that the conduct of government undercover agents who collected…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Menna v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. BayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. United States v. Ralph Kelly Taylor, IICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Torres v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Terry Lee Harris v. R. A. Young, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
  3. Whiteaker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
  4. Luis M. Rivera v. Evangelio La PorteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  5. In Re Harold E. Ford, (91-5497). United States of America v. Harold E. Ford, Douglas Beaty, Karl A. Schledwitz, and David Crabtree, (91-5548)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API