Legal Opinion

Hocking Glass Co. v. Miller

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 22, 1933No. 2906PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.

HOUGH, District Judge.

1. Plaintiff is now, and at all times hereinafter mentioned was, a corporation organized November 5, 1905, and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the state ofl. *356Ohio, having its office and place of business in the city of Lancaster, in the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, and that it has been, was in 1924, and subsequent thereto, and now is, engaged in the business of manufacturing a general line of glassware.

2. The defendant herein is now, and since April 7, 1921, has been, the duly appointed, qualified, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. North River Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1914
  2. Insurance Co. of North America v. Canada, Sugar-Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
  3. Wilson & Toomer Fertilizer Co. v. Automobile Ins.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miller v. Hocking Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API