Legal Opinion

Wembley, Inc. v. Commissioner of Patents of the United States of America

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 7, 1965No. 19201PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAHY, Circuit Judge:

In the District Court appellant, Wembley, sued the Commissioner of Patents praying that the Commissioner, in a proceeding in the Patent Office, be compelled to comply with Rule 13(a), Fed. R.Civ.P., 1 by reason of Rule 2.117(a) 2 of the Trademark Rules of Practice. The proceeding in the Patent Office is one in which the Diplomat Tie Company seeks cancellation of a trademark of Wembley. On motion of the Commissioner the District Court dismissed the complaint. We affirm, deeming the ruling of the Patent Office interlocutory and not ripe for challenge in the courts.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Chicago Automobile Trade Association v. Ross M. Madden, Regional Director, Thirteenth Region, National Labor RelationsboardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
  3. Union Oil Company of California v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
  4. Master, Wardens, Searchers, Assistants and Commonalty of the Co. Of Cutlers in Hallamshire in County of York v. Sheffield Steel CorpCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Weil v. DannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. BrennerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API