Legal Opinion

Shamie v. Grossman

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 25, 1971No. 9749PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

34 Mich. App. 97 (1971)

190 N.W.2d 734

SHAMIE

v.

GROSSMAN

Docket No. 9749.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided May 25, 1971.

John Cozart, Jr., for plaintiff.

Hyman & Rice, for defendants.

Before: DANHOF, P.J., and FITZGERALD and QUINN, JJ.

2Per curiam

Plaintiff filed an action on the promissory note of defendants. They moved for accelerated judgment on the basis of payment, GCR 1963, 116.1(5), and supported the motion with an appropriate affidavit. Although afforded ample opportunity by way of amendment and discovery, plaintiff did not rebut the allegations of payment contained in defendants' affidavit, and…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Thornton Construction Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Shamie v. GrossmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Empire Shoe Service, Inc. v. GershensonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API