Legal Opinion

Shamie v. Grossman

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 25, 1971No. Docket No. 9749PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Plaintiff filed an action on the promissory note of defendants. They moved for accelerated judgment on the basis of payment, GCR 1963, 116.1(5), and supported the motion with an *98appropriate affidavit. Although afforded ample opportunity by way of amendment and discovery, plaintiff did not rebut the allegations of payment contained in defendants’ affidavit, and accelerated judgment in their favor entered.

The trial judge was justified in accepting the facts stated in defendants’ affidavit as true, People, ex rel. Thornton Construction Company, Inc., v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Thornton Construction Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1967

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shamie v. GrossmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API