Legal Opinion

Island Coal Co. v. Neal

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 30, 1896No. 1,825PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Greene Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGavin, C. J.

The appellee, by his next friend, sued appellant to recover damages resulting from injuries received by him through its negligent failure to pro*16vide for Mm a safe place to work while laboring in its coal mine.

Appellant seeks to bring the case before us by means of a “common law” bill of exceptions.

Appellee insists that no question is really presented, but we do not stop to pass upon this proposition.

All the questions argued arise upon the motion for a new trial, which is properly in the record.

While instruction No. 20 cannot be regarded as a. model of technical accuracy, we are of opinion…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Poland v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. ModesittIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Keller v. ReynoldsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Bonebrake v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Pennsylvania Co. v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Citizens Street Railroad v. HamerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Indianapolis & Northwestern Traction Co. v. HendersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Miller v. StevensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Apperson v. LazroIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Engen v. Rambler Copper & Platium Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API