State v. Saldana
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction entered pursuant to a jury verdict of aggravated rape, Minn. St. 1974, § 609.291(2). Defendant principally contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel, was prejudiced by the absence of an interpreter at the preliminary hearing, and was entitled under the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution to have his pretrial jail time credited against his sentence. We disagree and accordingly affirm.
Complainant testified at trial that, subsequent to a party celebrating her completion of an…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Willie Decoster, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- United States of America Ex Rel. Countee Williams v. John J. Twomey, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Perovich v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Stapf v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. MontalvoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. ChamCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. SelallaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. RoySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.