Legal Opinion

Egros v. Pempton

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 18, 1991No. Nos. CA 90 0526, CA 90 0527PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOIL, Judge.

At issue in this appeal is whether an uninsured motorist carrier may recover the full amount of what it has paid to its insured’s beneficiaries from a non-motorist tortfeasor found to be 15% at fault. The trial court allowed the uninsured motorist full reimbursement on its cross claim. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The facts forming the basis for this appeal are not in dispute. On July 23, 1987, Bruno Egros was driving his vehicle on Highway 73 in Ascension Parish when he collided with an 18-wheeler which was blocking traffic on the highway. The 18-wheeler, driven by…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  2. Hoefly v. Government Employees Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  3. Bond v. Commercial Union Assur. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  4. Niemann v. Travelers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  5. Fertitta v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Egros v. PemptonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  2. Egros v. PemptonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API