Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 5, 1936No. 13,929PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

This is a Workmen’s Compensation case. Plaintiffs in error are hereinafter referred to as the Trust and Rhodes, respectively, and the latter’s wife as Mrs. Rhodes. Defendants in error are referred to as the Commission and Mrs. Henderson, respectively, and the latter’s deceased husband as Henderson.

Henderson was killed by a rock slide while placer mining on property owned by the Trust, which carried no insurance. Mrs. Henderson filed her claim with the Commission, which found for her. The district court sustained the award and to review that judgment plaintiffs in error prosecute this writ.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. Continental Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  2. Flick v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  3. Wales v. MowerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  4. Silver Mountain Mine Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stortroen v. Beneficial Finance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. State v. ErwinUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Guy Martin Buick, Inc. v. Colorado Springs National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  4. Zambruk v. Perlmutter 3rd Generation Builders, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Peterson v. Trailways, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API