Neely v. Jones
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.
This boundary line dispute involves the ownership of a strip of land, less than an acre, lying between the appellants’ property to the east and the appellees ’ property to the west. The case began as an action in ejectment but was later transferred to equity. At the close of the plaintiffs’ proof the chancellor sustained a demurrer to the evidence, and this appeal is from the ensuing order of dismissal. The only question is whether the demurrer to the evidence was properly sustained. This depends, under our holding in Werbe v. Holt, 217 Ark. 198, 229 S. W. 2d 225, upon whether the proof,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Werbe v. HoltSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Tull v. AshcraftSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
- Cossey v. HouseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hedger Bros. Cement & Materials, Inc. v. StumpCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
- Swink v. GiffinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Minton v. McGowanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Neely v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
- Weston v. HilliardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.