Strock v. So. Ry. &8212 Carolina Division
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1DissentJustice Cothran
(dissenting) : This is an action for damages alleged to have resulted from the breach of an express contract “and from other causes of action as alleged in the complaint.”
The complaint contains at least two causes of action, not separately stated as the statute requires : (1) For damages resulting from the breach of an alleged agreement on the part of the railway company to supply the plaintiff with at least two cars per week, for the shipment of sawlogs, in the production of which the plaintiff was extensively engaged, at or near a station on the defendant’s line known as “Fifty-Eight,” in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Davis v. CornwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Mauldin v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.