State Ex Rel. Bornemann v. Schultz

The relator Bornemann contends that he is entitled to the writ of prohibition prayed for by him on the ground that the civil court of Milwaukee county and the respondent Schultz, as a judge of said court, are without jurisdiction to vacate or grant other relief with respect to the two judgments docketed against Nickel on May 18, 1950, and June 2, 1950, respectively, because more than one year had elapsed since the entering and docketing of both of said judgments on June 5, 1951, when Nickel had the order to show cause issued by the respondent Schultz and served upon Bornemann.

Sec. 21 of the…