Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1922PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoseNberry, J.

No errors are formally assigned in the brief filed on behalf of the defendant, but from the argument we deduce the following assignments: First, that the court erred in rejecting testimony offered by the defendant to show that the amount of liquor consumed on the *465afternoon and evening in question would not ordinarily intoxicate him. Second, that it was error to permit Mrs. Kenney, one of the persons injured, to appear upon the witness stand and give her testimony, for the reason -that it unnecessarily aroused the passions of the jury, she having had both legs amputated as a result of injuries…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hogan v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  2. In re CarlsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Kilkelly v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Carlone v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. . TrottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Commonwealth v. MayberrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. State v. WesoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Zenou v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Wagner v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API