Legal Opinion

Ago

Washington Attorney General Reports

Decided February 1, 2010Published

1Opinion of the Court

Neil Gorrell, Chair Executive Ethics Board PO Box 40149 Olympia, WA 98504-0149

Dear Mr. Gorrell:

By letter previously acknowledged, you have requested our opinion on four questions, which we have combined into three and paraphrased as follows:

1. In RCW 9.46.0209, does the use of the term "charitable or benevolent entity, including but not limited to a person or family in need," mean that a group of employees may conduct a raffle for any needy person or family the group chooses?

2. If RCW 9.46.0209 means that a group of employees may conduct a raffle for any needy person or family, can that needy…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. American Continental Insurance v. SteenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. American Continental Ins. Co. v. SteenWashington Supreme Court · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API