Legal Opinion

Cisneros v. Lynch

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 25, 2016No. 15-3238PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD, Chief Judge.

José Antonio Cisneros, who had been a lawful permanent resident of the United States since 1996, had the bad judgment to commit unarmed robbery in 2012. This is an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii), and so one result of his conviction was the loss of his legal permanent resident status. His conviction also made him inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(I) — that is, unable to adjust his status back to that of a lawful permanent resident — because robbery is a crime of moral turpitude. In order to regain eligibility for relief from removal through…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Casado v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  2. Eugeniusz Wojciechowicz v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  3. Eugeniusz Wojciechowicz v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  4. Eugeniusz Wojciechowicz v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API