Mutch v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
SMITH, Senior Judge.
Defendant has filed a Motion for Summary Dismissal arguing that Plaintiffs Complaint1 *314fails to allege a claim within this Court’s jurisdiction. Specifically, Defendant asserts that Plaintiff’s claim is time barred under the statute of limitations imposed by 28 U.S.C. § 2501. Plaintiff comes before this Court challenging the validity of his 1961 military discharge and asserts that the six year statute of limitations provided by 28 U.S.C. § 2501 does not apply to his claims.
After review of all the pleadings, the Court hereby GRANTS the Defendant’s Motion to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- The Japanese War Notes Association of the Philippines, Inc. (Japwancap, Inc.) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.