Maher v. Maher
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.
We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s petition for modification of child support. The party moving for a modification of child support has the burden of proving all of the following factors, or rather, “three fundamental prerequisites,” Woolf v. Woolf, 901 So.2d 905, 912 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005): “First, there must be a substantial change in circumstances. Second, the change was not contemplated at the time of final judgment of dissolution. Third, the change is ‘sufficient, material, involuntary, and permanent in nature.’” (quoting Pimm v. Pimm 601 So.2d 534, 536 (Fla.1992)). When the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pimm v. PimmSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Tietig v. BoggsSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Fritz v. FritzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Hand v. KushmerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kozell v. KozellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- deLabry v. SalesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- William Moncrief Wood, Jr Former Husband v. Peggy Hodge Wood, Former WifeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Van Looven v. Van LoovenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- deLabry v. SalesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014