Legal Opinion

Pimm v. Pimm

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 28, 1992No. 76885PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

601 So.2d 534 (1992)

Maurice C. PIMM, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent,

v.

Carolyn M. PIMM, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner.

No. 76885.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 28, 1992.

Susana D. Gonzalez and Richard A. Weis of Susana D. Gonzalez, P.A., Tampa, for petitioner/cross-respondent.

Nancy Hutcheson Harris and A. Ann Arledge of Maney, Damsker & Arledge, P.A., Tampa, for respondent/cross-petitioner.

HARDING, Justice.

We review Pimm v. Pimm, 568 So.2d 1299 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990), in which the district court of appeal certified the following question as a matter of great public importance:

IS THE POSTJUDGMENT RETIREMENT…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chastain v. ChastainSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  2. Scott v. ScottDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  3. Withers v. WithersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Ward v. WardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Bogan v. BoganTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Sommer v. SommerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Krueger v. KruegerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Pierce v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  5. Acker v. AckerSupreme Court of Florida · 2005

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API