Pimm v. Pimm
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
601 So.2d 534 (1992)
Maurice C. PIMM, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent,
v.
Carolyn M. PIMM, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner.
No. 76885.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 28, 1992.
Susana D. Gonzalez and Richard A. Weis of Susana D. Gonzalez, P.A., Tampa, for petitioner/cross-respondent.
Nancy Hutcheson Harris and A. Ann Arledge of Maney, Damsker & Arledge, P.A., Tampa, for respondent/cross-petitioner.
HARDING, Justice.
We review Pimm v. Pimm, 568 So.2d 1299 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990), in which the district court of appeal certified the following question as a matter of great public importance:
IS THE POSTJUDGMENT RETIREMENT…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chastain v. ChastainSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Scott v. ScottDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- Withers v. WithersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Ward v. WardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
3Cited by64 opinions
- Bogan v. BoganTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- Sommer v. SommerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Krueger v. KruegerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Pierce v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- Acker v. AckerSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.