Legal Opinion
Twin Mountain Rock v. Ramirez
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided February 2, 1994No. 14816PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTZ, Judge.
Modesto Ramirez (Claimant) appeals from an award under the Workers’ Compensation Act, claiming that he was entitled to a higher level of benefits for scheduled injuries. The Workers’ Compensation Judge found that Claimant had suffered a twenty-percent impairment of his left leg at the knee and a forty-five-percent impairment of his right large toe arising from work-related injuries on November 7, 1989, and April 17, 1990. He also found that Claimant was disabled by the injuries. The Judge awarded scheduled-injury benefits under NMSA 1978, Section 52-l-43(B)…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anaya v. New Mexico Steel Erectors, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Hise Construction v. CandelariaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Witcher v. Capitan Drilling CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- Matthews v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- Pacheco v. Springer CorporationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
3Cited by7 opinions
- Leo v. Cornucopia RestaurantNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Torres v. Plastech Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- Smith v. Arizona Public Service Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- State Ex Rel. Udall v. Public Employees Retirement BoardNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Lucero v. Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.