Legal Opinion

Plue v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 8, 1920No. 9596PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Plaintiff in error was convicted of violations of the prohibition act of 1915. Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. Greeley W. Whitford, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Allen

*251The defendant, plaintiff in error here, was convicted of violations of the prohibition act of 1915 (Ch. 98, p. 275, S. L. 1915). He was found guilty of unlawfully keeping intoxicating liquor for sale, of offering for sale, and of selling intoxicating liquor in violation of the statute.

The assignment of error to which most of the argument is directed, relates to the refusal of the trial court to direct a verdict of acquittal. In this connection the contention of the defendant is, in effect, that the alleged offenses were instigated by witnesses and officers of the state, and that, therefore,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fiunkin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920
  2. People ex rel. Town of Sterling v. ChipmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. LeeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  2. O'BRIEN v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
  3. Simmons v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  4. Clark v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  5. City of Canon v. LandenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API