Legal Opinion
Perry v. Schwarzenegger
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 14, 2011No. C 09-02292 JWPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTINTERVENORS’ MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT
JAMES WARE, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Presently before the Court is Defendanh-Intervenors’ Motion to Vacate. 1 The Motion is made on the ground that the presiding judge, Chief District Judge Vaughn R. Walker (retired), was disqualified from presiding over this case. The grounds and procedures for recusal or disqualification of a federal judge are codified in Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 455, et seq. Those statutes require a federal judge to recuse if, inter alia, the judge has a substantial non-pecuniary interest in the case, or if there is…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. HollandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. John M. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Ignacio Alberto ORTIZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Terry STEWART, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Perry v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Kevin Miles v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- In the Matter of the Estate of Juanita Valcarce (Valcarce v. Valcarce)Court of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- Perry v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- KRISTIN PERRY v. EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.