Legal Opinion

Kevin Miles v. Charles Ryan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 28, 2012No. 10-99016PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order; Statement by Judges BERSON and TALLMAN.

ORDER

Appellant’s motion for recusal is DENIED.

BERZON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges:

Appellant’s motion to recuse Judge Graber was, in its format, directed to all three judges on the three-judge panel in this case. Under this Circuit’s procedures, however, each judge may decide for himself or herself whether recusal is appropriate. See, e.g., Suever v. Connell, 681 F.3d 1064 (9th Cir.2012); Feminist Women’s Health Center v. Codispoti, 69 F.3d 399 (9th Cir.1995); 28 U.S.C.A. § 455. We therefore directed the motion to Judge Graber alone, who has denied…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. HollandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Perry v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Perry v. SchwarzeneggerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011
  4. Agnes Suever v. Kathleen ConnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Virginia Duncan v. Rob BontaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  2. Richard Hurles v. Charles L. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Barnes v. Westfield GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Richard Hurles v. Charles L. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. Richard Hurles v. Charles L. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API