Kevin Miles v. Charles Ryan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Order; Statement by Judges BERSON and TALLMAN.
ORDER
Appellant’s motion for recusal is DENIED.
BERZON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges:
Appellant’s motion to recuse Judge Graber was, in its format, directed to all three judges on the three-judge panel in this case. Under this Circuit’s procedures, however, each judge may decide for himself or herself whether recusal is appropriate. See, e.g., Suever v. Connell, 681 F.3d 1064 (9th Cir.2012); Feminist Women’s Health Center v. Codispoti, 69 F.3d 399 (9th Cir.1995); 28 U.S.C.A. § 455. We therefore directed the motion to Judge Graber alone, who has denied…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. HollandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Perry v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Perry v. SchwarzeneggerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Agnes Suever v. Kathleen ConnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
3Cited by7 opinions
- Virginia Duncan v. Rob BontaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Richard Hurles v. Charles L. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Barnes v. Westfield GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Richard Hurles v. Charles L. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Richard Hurles v. Charles L. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.