Phelps v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAIDIK, Judge.
Case Summary
Charles Phelps (Phelps) appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. He argues that the post-conviction court should have granted his petition because he received ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. Because we find that Phelps did not receive ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, we affirm the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief.
Facts and Procedural History
On July 2, 1992, Phelps was involved in an altercation with a police officer. He was later charged with both battery as a class C felony and being an habitual…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bigler v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Atchley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Gray v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Stiles v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Carey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Phelps v. VannattaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003