Legal Opinion

Roberto Madrid-Farfan v. Jefferson Sessions

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 9, 2018No. 13-73048Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 9 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROBERTO MADRID-FARFAN, No. 13-73048 Petitioner, Agency No. A092-444-197 v. MEMORANDUM* JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted June 15, 2018 San Francisco, California Before: SCHROEDER, EBEL,** and GOULD, Circuit Judges. Roberto Madrid-Farfan (Petitioner) seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) holding that because of a 1999 conviction…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Moncrieffe v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Marmolejo-Campos v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Hongke Zhang v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. Melvin Martinez-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API