Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Knight

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 22, 1926PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

The defendants, Knight, Membrino and Oakman were found guilty of conspiracy to steal upon several counts of an indictment numbered 2152. On indict-*423meats numbered 2150, 2153, 2154, 2155, 2156 and 2157, verdicts of not guilty were returned by order of the trial judge. The motion of the defendants for a bill of particulars was complied with.

The defendants’ first exception relates to the testimony of Police Inspector Towle. He testified that he visited the defendants’ office and saw the defendants; that in the course of a conversation with the defendant Oakman, the latter gave him a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SaccoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  2. Commonwealth v. KennedyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  3. Clarke v. City of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Commonwealth v. KaplanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  5. Boston Food Products Co. v. Wilson & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SimpsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Commonwealth v. BelenskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. Commonwealth v. LammiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  4. A. T. Stearns Lumber Co. v. HowlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  5. Commonwealth v. DemboskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API