Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lammi

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 30, 1941PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The present defendant, Lammi, and two others were jointly indicted for assault with intent to rob and robbery of a sum of money from Albert C. Bacon. After conviction at a trial conducted under the provisions of G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 278, §§ 33A-33G, Lammi, hereinafter called the defendant, has appealed under § 33B.

1. There was no error in the refusal of the judge to strike out a portion of the Commonwealth’s bill of particulars. Before trial the defendant had moved that the Commonwealth be ordered to specify in detail (1) the exact place and (2) time of the alleged assault and robbery, (3) the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Commonwealth v. SaccoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. Commonwealth v. BartoliniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  4. Commonwealth v. DevereauxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  5. Commonwealth v. HowardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WelanskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Commonwealth v. DomanskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  3. Commonwealth v. FrenchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  4. Commonwealth v. FlynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  5. Commonwealth v. KiernanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API